Fund Selection Policy & Risk Profiling

A structured, documented, and repeatable process for identifying and recommending mutual fund schemes — based entirely on objective analysis, never on commission incentives.

Fund Selection Process Flow

Our fund selection follows this step-by-step process. No scheme is recommended without completing all steps.

01

Identify Investment Category

Based on client's goal, investment horizon, and assessed risk profile — identify the suitable MF category (Large Cap, Mid Cap, Small Cap, Flexi Cap, Hybrid, Debt, ELSS, Index, etc.)

02

AMC Screening

Evaluate AMC reputation, total AUM size, regulatory track record (no SEBI action), fund management team stability, and operational efficiency

03

Performance Analysis

Compare rolling returns across 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods against the scheme's benchmark index and category average. Avoid relying only on point-to-point returns

04

Risk-Adjusted Return Analysis

Evaluate Sharpe Ratio (return per unit of risk), Sortino Ratio (downside risk), Standard Deviation, and Maximum Drawdown to assess risk-reward balance

05

Expense Ratio Comparison

Compare expense ratios within the peer category. Lower expense ratio is preferred as it has a significant impact on long-term wealth creation

06

Fund Manager Review

Assess fund manager's tenure with the scheme, track record across market cycles, and investment style consistency. Flag schemes with more than 2 fund manager changes in 3 years

07

Portfolio Quality Check

For equity funds: check sector concentration, single-stock exposure, and market-cap allocation. For debt funds: check credit quality (minimum AA-), maturity profile, and concentration risk

08

SEBI Riskometer Mapping

Map each shortlisted scheme to its SEBI Riskometer category (Low to Very High) and match to client risk profiles (Conservative / Moderate / Aggressive)

09

Approval

Final recommended scheme list reviewed and approved before being used for client distribution. No scheme is recommended without sign-off

10

Yearly Review

Recommended list reviewed every year. Underperforming schemes replaced based on the same objective criteria. Ad-hoc reviews triggered by major market events or regulatory changes

Suitability Matrix

Every investor is mapped to one of six risk profiles. Investment recommendations are made only within the appropriate category.

Risk Profile Short Term (<3 Years) Medium Term (3–7 Years) Long Term (>7 Years)
Very Conservative (0–15%) Overnight, Liquid, Money Market. Equity: 0%, Debt: 100% Ultra Short Duration, Floating Rate. Equity: 0–5%, Debt: 95–100% Short Duration, Banking & PSU, Gilt. Equity: 0–10%, Debt: 90–100%
Conservative (16–30%) Liquid, Ultra Short Duration, Arbitrage. Equity: 0–10%, Debt: 90–100% Short Duration, Conservative Hybrid. Equity: 10–25%, Debt: 75–90% Conservative Hybrid, Large Cap (up to 15%). Equity: 15–30%, Debt: 70–85%
Moderate (31–50%) Ultra Short Duration, Conservative Hybrid. Equity: 15–25%, Debt: 75–85% Balanced Hybrid, Aggressive Hybrid, Large Cap. Equity: 35–50%, Debt: 50–65% Flexi Cap, Multi Cap, Large & Mid Cap, ELSS. Equity: 50–65%, Debt: 35–50%
Moderately Aggressive (51–70%) Equity Savings, Aggressive Hybrid. Equity: 25–40%, Debt: 60–75% Flexi Cap, Multi Cap, Focused Fund. Equity: 50–70%, Debt: 30–50% Flexi Cap, Mid Cap, Value/Contra, ELSS. Equity: 65–80%, Debt: 20–35%
Aggressive (71–85%) Aggressive Hybrid, Dynamic Asset Allocation. Equity: 30–50%, Debt: 50–70% Mid Cap, Flexi Cap, Sectoral/Thematic. Equity: 65–85%, Debt: 15–35% Mid Cap, Small Cap, Sectoral, Thematic. Equity: 80–100%, Debt: 0–20%
Very Aggressive (86–100%) Aggressive Hybrid, Focused Equity. Equity: 40–60%, Debt: 40–60% Small Cap, Sectoral, International Equity. Equity: 75–100%, Debt: 0–25% Small Cap, Micro Cap, Sectoral, International. Equity: 90–100%, Debt: 0–10%

Exclusion Criteria

The following are automatically excluded from our recommended list:

Schemes from AMCs under SEBI regulatory action or warning

Schemes with high portfolio concentration in a single stock or sector beyond category norms

Debt schemes with significant exposure to below-investment-grade (below AA-) securities

Schemes with more than 2 fund manager changes in the last 3 years

Close-ended or interval schemes unless specifically required for a client's goal

Unsuitability Declaration

If a client insists on investing in a scheme that exceeds their risk profile ceiling, a written Unsuitability Declaration is obtained. This declaration clearly states that:

  1. The investor has been informed that the chosen scheme does not match their assessed risk profile
  2. The distributor does not recommend this particular investment
  3. The investor is proceeding at their own risk and volition against the distributor's recommendation

The declaration is signed by the investor and maintained in records as per AMFI DDQ requirements.

Conflict of Interest Declaration

Get2ndIncome declares that:

  1. We do not have any proprietary relationship with any AMC
  2. Our fund recommendations are not influenced by commission structures
  3. We maintain a documented fund selection process that is auditable
  4. Commission disclosure is made to every investor at the time of investment